Bleeding in the THEMIS trial
In high-risk patients with CAD who had T2D and no history of MI or stroke,
- Primary Safety End Point (TIMI Major bleeding) BRILINTA 60 mg plus aspirin (N=9562) vs aspirin alone (N=9531):
- K-M% at 36 months, 2.2% vs 1.0%, respectively (HR 2.32; 95% CI 1.82-2.94)1
- Events per 1000 patient years: 9 vs 4, respectively2
- Fatal bleeding events per 1000 patient years: 1 vs 0, respectively2
Bleeding in patients with and without a history of PCI3*
Bleeding in patients with and without a history of PCI3*
TIMI major bleeding
TIMI major or minor bleeding
Fatal bleeding
Intracranial hemorrhage
PATIENTS WITH A HISTORY OF PCI
BRILINTA 60 mg + aspirin (N=5536)
Aspirin (N=5564)
n (%) patients with events
TIMI major bleeding111 (2.0%)
TIMI major or minor bleeding157 (2.8%)
Fatal bleeding6 (0.1%)
Intracranial hemorrhage33 (0.6%)
PATIENTS WITH A HISTORY OF PCI
Aspirin (N=5564)
n (%) patients with events
TIMI major bleeding62 (1.1%)
TIMI major or minor bleeding80 (1.4%)
Fatal bleeding6 (0.1%)
Intracranial hemorrhage31 (0.6%)
TIMI major bleeding
TIMI major or minor bleeding
Fatal bleeding
Intracranial hemorrhage
PATIENTS WITHOUT A HISTORY OF PCI
BRILINTA 60 mg + aspirin (N=4026)
Aspirin (N=3967)
n (%) patients with events
TIMI major bleeding95 (2.4%)
TIMI major or minor bleeding128 (3.2%)
Fatal bleeding11 (0.3%)
Intracranial hemorrhage37 (0.9%)
PATIENTS WITHOUT A HISTORY OF PCI
Aspirin (N=3967)
n (%) patients with events
TIMI major bleeding38 (1.0%)
TIMI major or minor bleeding49 (1.2%)
Fatal bleeding4 (0.1%)
Intracranial hemorrhage15 (0.4%)
THEMIS used the following bleeding severity categorization: TIMI major: fatal bleeding or any intracranial bleeding or clinically overt signs of hemorrhage associated with a drop in Hb of ≥5 g/dL or a fall in Hct of ≥15%. Fatal: a bleeding event that directly led to death within 7 days. TIMI minor: clinically apparent with 3-5 g/dL decrease in Hb.
*Safety analysis population was all randomly assigned patients who took at least 1 dose of study drug.3
THEMIS was not designed or powered to demonstrate the efficacy or safety of BRILINTA compared with placebo in specific subgroups. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate consistency of results in different cohorts. Analyses must be interpreted cautiously, as differences can reflect the play of chance among a large number of analyses.
Do you have questions about the THEMIS study?
THEMIS STUDY DESIGN
THEMIS was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ticagrelor vs placebo in 19,220 patients, on top of low-dose (75 to 150 mg) aspirin for the prevention of thrombotic CV events (CV death, MI, stroke). Patients ≥50 years with type 2 diabetes receiving an anti-hyperglycemic medication for at least 6 months, and with stable CAD (ie, history of PCI, CABG, or angiographic stenosis ≥50% in at least 1 coronary artery) were enrolled. Patients with known prior MI or stroke were excluded. Patients were treated for a median of 33 months and up to 58 months.1,2
CABG=coronary artery bypass graft; CAD=coronary artery disease; CV=cardiovascular; Hb=hemoglobin; Hct=hematocrit; MI=myocardial infarction; PCI=percutaneous coronary intervention; THEMIS=Effect of Ticagrelor on Health Outcomes in DiabEtes Mellitus Patients Intervention Study; TIMI=Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction; T2D=type 2 diabetes.
References
- Steg PG, Bhatt DL, Simon T, et al; THEMIS Steering Committee and Investigators. Ticagrelor in patients with stable coronary disease and diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(14):1309-1320.
- BRILINTA® (ticagrelor) [package insert]. Wilmington, DE: AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP; 2024.
- Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Mehta SR, et al; THEMIS Steering Committee and Investigators. Ticagrelor in patients with diabetes and stable coronary artery disease with a history of previous percutaneous coronary intervention (THEMIS-PCI): a phase 3, placebo-controlled, randomised trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10204):1169-1180.
BRILINTA was studied in more than 19,000 patients with CAD + T2D in themis1,2
The THEMIS trial was a Phase 3b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing BRILINTA 60 mg twice daily versus aspirin for the prevention of CV events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), who also had type 2 diabetes (T2D) and no history of MI or stroke, at high risk for such events (N=19,220). All patients received low-dose aspirin 75–150 mg once daily, unless contraindicated or not tolerated.1,2
The primary efficacy end point was composite of CV death, MI, or stroke. The primary safety end point was TIMI major bleeding. Median follow-up was 33 months and up to 58 months.1
Key inclusion criteria were CAD defined as a history of PCI/CABG or ≥50% lumen stenosis confirmed by angiography, age ≥50, and T2D (glucose-lowering medication for ≥6 months).1 Patients were excluded if they had a history of previous MI or stroke or planned revascularization.2
Select baseline characteristics

Median age: 66 years
Male sex: 68.6%
More than half (58%) of patients had PCI in the past (median time since most recent PCI: 3.3 years)2
CABG=coronary artery bypass graft; CAD=coronary artery disease; CV=cardiovascular; MI=myocardial infarction; PCI=percutaneous coronary intervention; THEMIS=Effect of Ticagrelor on Health Outcomes in DiabEtes Mellitus Patients Intervention Study; TIMI=Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction; T2D=type 2 diabetes.
References: 1. BRILINTA® (ticagrelor) [package insert]. Wilmington, DE: AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP; 2024. 2. Steg PG, Bhatt DL, Simon T, et al; THEMIS Steering Committee and Investigators. Ticagrelor in patients with stable coronary disease and diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(14):1309-1320 and Supplementary Appendix.