#1 Prescribed OAP for STEMI PCI1

BRILINTA patient sitting on an adirondack chair, enjoying a day in the backyard
BRILINTA patient sitting on an adirondack chair, enjoying a day in the backyard

SUPERIORITY saves lives: BRILINTA SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCED CV DEATH vs clopidogrel at 12 months in patients with ACS2,3

PLATO secondary efficacy end point

CV death at 12 months2,3*

The PLATO Secondary End Point
The PLATO Secondary End Point

*K-M rate is the rate of first events only.

 

Hazard ratio derived from a Cox proportional-hazards model on data from the primary and secondary end points.3

 

NNT=number needed to treat and is calculated as 1/ARR.

 

Relative risk increase is calculated by inverting the HR for CV death at 12 months (0.79), subtracting 1 from that number, and multiplying by 100.

  • Secondary efficacy end point of CV death at 12 months for BRILINTA plus aspirin vs clopidogrel plus aspirin: Events per 1000 patient years: 45 vs 57, respectively

Why choose second best?

SAVE MORE LIVES with BRILINTA


Request a Rep

Do you have questions about the PLATO study?

REQUEST A REP

Couple Relaxing

Additional PLATO secondary efficacy end points2,3

Patients with outcome events (events/1000 patient years)

Patients with outcome events (events/1000 patient years)

 


MIǂ§


Stroke§


All-cause mortality

BRILINTA 90 mg + aspirin (N=9333)

MIǂ§65

Stroke§16

All-cause mortality51

Clopidogrel + aspirin (N=9291)

MIǂ§76

Stroke§14

All-cause mortality65

Outcomes at 12 months (K-M%)

Outcomes at 12 months (K-M%)

 


MIǂ§


Stroke§


All-cause mortality

BRILINTA 90 mg + aspirin (N=9333)


MIǂ§5.8


Stroke§1.5


All-cause mortality4.5

Clopidogrel + aspirin (N=9291)


MIǂ§6.9


Stroke§1.3


All-cause mortality5.9

HR (95% CI)


MIǂ§0.84 (0.75–0.95)


Stroke§1.17 (0.91–1.52)


All-cause mortality0.78 (0.69–0.89)

P-value


MIǂ§0.0045


Stroke§0.22


All-cause mortality0.0003ǁ

Hazard ratio derived from a Cox proportional-hazards model on data from the primary and secondary end points.3

 

Excluding silent MI.

 

§Including patients who could have had other nonfatal events or died.

 

||Due to the hierarchical test sequence in PLATO, all-cause mortality was an exploratory analysis and, therefore, the P-value is nominal.3

Request a Rep

Do you have questions about the PLATO study?

REQUEST A REP

Treat patients with ACS, not just the stent. SUPERIOR CV EVENT REDUCTION with BRILINTA vs clopidogrel at 12 months2,3

PLATO primary efficacy end point

Composite of CV death, MI,* or stroke at 12 months2,3

PLATO Primary Efficacy End Point
PLATO Primary Efficacy End Point

PLATO OUTCOMES CONFIRMED in >45,000 patients

with ACS studied in real-world registry2,5

*Excluding silent MI.

 

Hazard ratio derived from a Cox proportional-hazards model on data from the primary and secondary end points.3

 

NNT=number needed to treat and is calculated as 1/ARR.

 

     

  • Events per 1000 patient years for BRILINTA vs clopidogrel: 111 vs 131, respectively
  • BRILINTA and clopidogrel were studied with aspirin and other standard therapies3
  •  

Why choose second best?

Make SUPERIORITY with BRILINTA your choice


Request a Rep

Do you have questions about the PLATO study?

REQUEST A REP

Man with Kid

In patients with prior MI, BRILINTA 60 mg + aspirin had superior CV event reduction at 3 years vs aspirin in PEGASUS2,7

PEGASUS primary efficacy end point

The PEGASUS Primary Efficacy End Point
The PEGASUS Primary Efficacy End Point
  • Events per 1000 patient years for BRILINTA 60 mg plus aspirin vs aspirin: 26 vs 31, respectively

Patients were treated for at least 12 months and up to 48 months with a median follow-up time of 33 months2

  • BRILINTA was studied in patients already on standard CV therapies in the PEGASUS trial7

*Due to rounding, the ARR is 1.27% and not 1.2%.

NNT=number needed to treat and is calculated as 1/ARR.

Request a Rep

Do you have questions about the PEGASUS study?

REQUEST A REP

 
PLATO STUDY DESIGN 

PLATO was a randomized, international, double-blind, controlled comparative study in patients with ACS hospitalized with or without ST-segment elevation, with an onset of symptoms within 24 hours (N=18,624). The study compared BRILINTA (180-mg loading dose, 90 mg twice daily thereafter) to clopidogrel (300-mg to 600-mg loading dose, 75 mg daily thereafter) for the prevention of thrombotic CV events (CV death, MI, or stroke). Study period was 12 months, with median duration of therapy of 277 days. BRILINTA and clopidogrel were studied with aspirin and other standard therapies.2,3

SWEDEHEART REAL-WORLD REGISTRY

An observational real-world comparative effectiveness study evaluated 45,073 consecutive patients with acute MI, discharged on clopidogrel or ticagrelor, using data from the SWEDEHEART Registry between 2010 and 2013. The analysis was adjusted for patient age, sex, pre-existing comorbidities, ACS presentation characteristics, in-hospital course, and discharge medications. This was an observational registry trial and while analyses were adjusted for confounding factors, the results are subject to potential bias and should be interpreted with caution.6

PEGASUS STUDY DESIGN

PEGASUS-TIMI 54 compared BRILINTA (90 mg twice daily or 60 mg twice daily) vs placebo, each given with low-dose aspirin (75 to 150 mg), for the prevention of thrombotic CV events (CV death, MI, or stroke) in 21,162 patients ≥50 years of age with a history of MI (1 to 3 years prior to randomization). Patients also had at least 1 risk factor for thrombotic CV events (age ≥65 years, diabetes mellitus requiring medication, at least 1 other prior MI, evidence of multivessel coronary artery disease, or creatinine clearance <60 mL/min). Only the 60-mg dose strength is approved for use in patients with a history of MI 1 year after an ACS event. Patients were treated for at least 12 months and up to 48 months with a median follow-up time of 33 months.2,7

ACC=American College of Cardiology; ACS=acute coronary syndrome; AHA=American Heart Association; ARR=absolute risk reduction; CI=confidence interval; CKD=chronic kidney disease; CV=cardiovascular; HR=hazard ratio; K-M=Kaplan-Meier; MI=myocardial infarction; NNT=number needed to treat; NSTEMI=non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction; OAP=oral antiplatelet; PCI=percutaneous coronary intervention; PEGASUS=Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin; PLATO=PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes; RRR=relative risk reduction; STEMI=ST-elevation myocardial infarction; SWEDEHEART=Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies; TIMI=Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction.

References
  1. Data on File, US-65430, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP.
  2. BRILINTA® (ticagrelor) [package insert]. Wilmington, DE: AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP; 2024.
  3. Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al; PLATO Investigators. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(11):1045-1057 and Supplementary Appendix.
  4. Data on File, REF-4911, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP.
  5. Data on File, REF-51076, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP.
  6. Sahlén A, Varenhorst C, Lagerqvist B, et al. Outcomes in patients treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel after acute myocardial infarction: experiences from SWEDEHEART registry. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(44):3335-3342.
  7. Bonaca MP, Bhatt DL, Cohen M, et al; PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Steering Committee and Investigators. Long-term use of ticagrelor in patients with prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(19):1791-1800.